powering productive workplaces
Front page
NewsTrust & Risk1h · 15:01 BST · 4 min read

Quantum is Coming: Here's What Networking Needs to Keep Up

Quantum systems could unlock new enterprise capabilities, but only if disparate machines can exchange information without compromising it, putting networking and interoperability at the heart of the industry’s path from research breakthrough to practical business value

The burgeoning of quantum technologies could reshape the enterprise landscape, giving regulated industries unparalleled computing capabilities to solve more complex problems and new ways to help protect highly sensitive data. Yet the industry’s next obstacle is less about building a single larger processor capable of delivering those benefits than connecting many smaller systems reliably enough to work together.

Networking could allow these separate systems to contribute to a larger computing environment rather than remain isolated machines. However, that depends on reconciling their differences so quantum information can move between systems without being compromised.

That will require switching technology, says Ramana Kompella, Head of Cisco Research. “If you truly want to scale it to interconnect more than hundred nodes, thousand nodes or a million nodes even, you need the switching technology,” Kompella told UC Today. The challenge is not simply creating more connections, but ensuring disparate systems can exchange quantum information reliably.

The Quantum Conundrum

Classical networks became globally useful because routers could move traffic between billions of endpoints regardless of the underlying devices. Quantum networks are still closer to the internet’s early point-to-point phase: specialist nodes can be linked, but turning those connections into a flexible network spanning many systems is a harder task.

The difficulty is that quantum information cannot be treated like conventional network traffic. It must retain the fragile quantum state that carries the information as it moves between systems, even where those systems use different technologies and encoding methods. If that state is degraded or destroyed in transit, the systems cannot reliably distribute the entanglement needed for quantum networking.

That limitation matters because the quantum industry is not converging on one type of machine. Kompella points to superconducting, trapped-ion, neutral-atom and photonic systems, each of which may be suited to different tasks:

“We don’t believe in the future where there’s only one technology.”

For organizations, the implication is that the network cannot be an afterthought: without an interoperable layer, quantum systems risk remaining isolated specialist resources.

For quantum technologies to become genuinely usable beyond specialist research environments, the industry will need common ways to connect, manage and measure different systems. The US National Institute of Standards and Technology identifies quantum interfaces that preserve quantum properties during conversion as necessary for connecting quantum computers, while its network testbeds are examining issues including control planes, synchronization, device performance and the coexistence of classical and quantum traffic. The message for businesses is that useful quantum infrastructure will depend on a broader networking ecosystem.

What Can Businesses Do About It?

One answer is a switching layer built specifically for quantum information. In a conventional network, switches direct traffic to its destination. In a quantum network, they would need to route photons between systems while preserving the quantum state encoded within them. Commercial optical switches can already direct photons, but as Kompella states, that alone is not enough:

“Commercial off-the-shelf switches don’t preserve the very fragile quantum states.”

That makes them unsuitable for network operations that depend on preserving entanglement.

Cisco’s Universal Quantum Switch is intended to address that shortfall by translating quantum information between systems using different encoding methods while preserving the state being transmitted. This is the practical importance of the “universal” description: it is not merely about connecting more devices, but about avoiding a network architecture that assumes every quantum system is built the same way.

The business case also extends beyond interoperability. Quantum networks rely on specialist components, including photon detectors and Bell-state measurement devices, which can be expensive. Kompella says a universal switching layer could allow those resources to be shared between different systems and parties that need to communicate, rather than requiring each to build its own isolated setup. That could make the economics of quantum infrastructure more practical as organizations move from individual experiments toward connected environments.

Real-world deployment experience is beginning to give this discussion more substance. In March, Cisco, Qunnect, New York University and QTD Systems reported an entanglement-based network across 17.6 kilometers of deployed telecom fiber, linking three nodes between Brooklyn and Manhattan. Cisco reported more than 5,400 entanglement-swapping pairs per hour and polarization fidelity above 99% in the metropolitan environment.

Why This Matters Going Forward

The significance of quantum networking is not that every organization will soon run a quantum data center. It is that the route to more capable quantum computing may rely on combining systems rather than waiting for a single machine to reach every required level of performance. Kompella argues that this is the practical route to addressing harder problems in areas such as pharmaceuticals, logistics, finance and materials discovery: a distributed environment in which smaller and medium-sized quantum computers are linked by a network fabric.

That places interoperability at the center of the quantum conversation. As more hardware approaches emerge, businesses will need to consider whether the systems they evaluate can operate beyond a single vendor’s environment. If they cannot, universal switching technologies such as Cisco’s could help bridge the gap between isolated systems and a wider range of quantum capabilities.

Quantum could become a central part of the next generation of enterprise computing, extending what organizations can model, optimize and secure when conventional systems reach their limits. The businesses that gain most from it will not necessarily be those that adopt the first quantum processor, but those prepared to turn emerging quantum capability into reliable, usable services.

rate this story
helps rank stories across uc today
The discussion0 takes · attributed & checked

Does this reflect your experience?

opening the room…
Read nextordered by techtelligence · every pick explained
picked for this story

You WILL Soon Have a Security Breach, So How Do You Prepare?

24 Sept 2026
picked for this storyWhy MFA Is Not Enough Against a New Wave of Identity Attacks22 Sept 2026picked for this storyCyber Roundup: Cut-Price AI, Intel Gaps, Expanded Monitoring26 Sept 2026