powering productive workplaces
Front page
InterviewImmersive Work1h · 10:17 BST · 2 min read

Can Virtual Simulation Ease Healthcare Training Bottlenecks?

Virtual simulation could help healthcare educators expand training capacity through repeatable, data-informed practice. Jason Coley of Maria College explains how VR, XR and AI can support confidence and assessment, while hands-on skills and clinical experience remain essential.

Healthcare education is under pressure to train more people while maintaining the quality and safety of practice-based learning.

In New York, approved nursing programmes can now deliver up to one-third of clinical education through simulation. The policy is intended to ease a capacity problem: when hospitals and clinics have limited availability for student placements, institutions can train fewer future healthcare professionals.

Building Capacity Without Replacing Clinical Practice

Jason Coley, Founding Director of the Center for Academic Innovation at Maria College, says virtual simulation can help relieve that bottleneck when it is integrated into an established education pathway rather than treated as a standalone technology project.

Speaking to UC Today, Coley explained that Maria College uses virtual reality, extended reality and AI-driven patient simulations alongside classroom teaching, skills labs and high-fidelity mannequin-based scenarios.

The technology can give students repeatable opportunities to practise clinical procedures, communication and decision-making in a lower-pressure setting. It can also help make complex subjects, such as anatomy, more accessible by allowing learners to explore the human body spatially rather than relying solely on lectures or textbook images.

Virtual simulations can capture information that is difficult to track consistently in conventional sessions. Faculty can review whether a student completed required actions in the correct sequence, while AI-based patient scenarios can help assess communication and interpersonal skills.

That data can support more targeted feedback. Instructors can identify whether an individual learner needs extra support or whether an entire cohort is missing the same step in a process.

Where Virtual Simulation Has Limits

Coley stressed that virtual simulation is not a substitute for every part of healthcare education. VR cannot reproduce weight, touch or the fine motor skills required for tasks such as inserting needles. Those capabilities still need to be developed through hands-on skills labs, supervised mannequin training and direct patient care.

The value, he argued, lies in using each form of simulation for what it does best. VR can provide scalable, repeatable and portable scenario-based learning, while physical simulation and clinical placements remain essential for tactile practice and real-world readiness.

There may also be a cost benefit. High-fidelity mannequins and their associated software can be expensive, with limited numbers of students able to use them at once. By shifting suitable elements of training into virtual environments, institutions may be able to make better use of those resources.

For Coley, the innovation is not simply the technology itself. It is the way it is deployed to expand capacity, strengthen assessment and give educators more time to focus on the areas where human instruction matters most.

rate this story
helps rank stories across uc today
The discussion0 takes · attributed & checked

Does this reflect your experience?

opening the room…
Read nextordered by techtelligence · every pick explained
same beat · Immersive Work

The Humanoid Robot Reality Check: What Enterprise AI Needs to Deliver

13 Aug 2026
same beat · Immersive WorkDo Smart Glasses Need Tougher Privacy Safeguards?12 Aug 2026same beat · Immersive WorkUK Pub Chain Clarifies Smart Glasses ‘Ban’ Reports11 Aug 2026