powering productive workplaces
Front page
InterviewWorkspace Tech38m · 09:01 GMT · 6 min read

AI Laptops: Useful Upgrade or Expensive AI Washing?

New laptops increasingly carry AI branding, but businesses may not need new hardware to use AI tools. Egiss’ Ole Bülow explains the difference between AI-ready devices and machines able to run AI locally – and why IT leaders should look beyond the label

The AI laptop is quickly becoming the default pitch from PC makers. New devices are being marketed around their ability to handle artificial intelligence tasks, promising better performance, privacy and battery life for employees using AI at work.

But most workers already access AI through cloud services on the laptops they have. That raises a more difficult question for IT buyers: does an AI laptop offer a clear reason to upgrade, or is the term being used to sell devices with higher specifications before companies have established a real need?

Ole Bülow, Director of Business Development at enterprise hardware and lifecycle provider Egiss, believes the answer depends on what an organisation means by “AI laptop.”

He argues the industry is currently grouping two very different kinds of device under the same label: laptops with a specialist chip that can support selected AI features, and more powerful machines configured to run larger AI models locally.

“There are different views of what an AI laptop is,” Bülow told UC Today.

“There is what I call the marketing view from Microsoft, which is the label that says this is an AI-ready laptop. And then there’s the new breed of laptops, which are high compute, with a lot of memory and fast disks and a lot of disk space, which allows you to run more AI locally.”

An AI Label Does Not Equal Local AI

The “AI-ready” label usually refers to a laptop with a neural processing unit, or NPU. This is a chip designed to handle certain AI tasks efficiently on the device itself.

For employees, that can support functions including background noise removal, camera effects, live captions, transcription, dictation and other features in meeting and productivity applications. Handling those jobs locally can reduce battery drain and avoid sending every task to a cloud service.

However, Bülow said that should not be confused with running a full-scale AI assistant or large language model directly on a laptop.

“An AI-ready laptop, based on Microsoft branding, is essentially that you have what’s called an NPU on the device, that allows you to run certain parts of an app’s AI on the device,” he said. “But you can’t really run the large language models on the device.”

That distinction matters because many of the AI tools employees use today do not rely on the extra AI hardware in their laptop. ChatGPT, Claude and many enterprise AI services run primarily in the cloud, with the work carried out in remote data centres rather than on the employee’s device.

Bülow said this makes some of the current marketing difficult to justify.

“Personally, I think it’s a bit of AI washing,” he said.

“Most enterprises these days use ChatGPT or Claude in the browser or an app on the device. That doesn’t need that NPU part of the device.”

Higher Specifications Change the Conversation

For Bülow, a device becomes genuinely AI-capable when it has enough memory, storage and processing power to run larger models locally.

That is a different requirement from simply buying a mainstream business laptop with an NPU. It may mean selecting a system with substantially more memory and storage than a typical employee device, and it is likely to come at a higher cost.

Research from Egiss found that 55.6 percent of the notebooks it supplied between June and August 2026 had at least 32GB of memory and an NPU.

While the figure represents the company's own supply data, and not the overall enterprise PC market, Bülow said it shows that customers are increasingly ordering devices with higher specifications.

But he drew a clear line between “AI-ready” and “AI-capable” devices.

“When we state AI-capable, we boil it down to the memory part and the disk part,” Bülow said. “When you’re looking at the large language models and running them locally, truly locally, then you’re looking at 64GB of RAM, one to two terabytes of disk space.”

Those specifications will not be necessary for every worker. A laptop used mainly for email, documents, browser-based AI tools and video calls may not benefit from the same configuration as one used by a developer, analyst or employee working with more demanding local AI applications.

The risk is that businesses treat the AI label as a universal procurement requirement rather than matching the device to the job.

The Case for Waiting

Bülow’s central point is that IT teams should separate two decisions that are often being presented as one.

The first is whether a business should include stronger AI capabilities when it reaches its normal device refresh cycle. The second is whether it should replace functioning laptops early because newer devices are marketed as AI-ready.

For most organisations, he suggested, these are not the same case.

A company whose fleet is due for replacement may decide that selecting more capable hardware is sensible. The devices may remain in service for three or four years, and IT teams will want to avoid buying systems that become limiting as workplace software evolves.

But that does not automatically support an early upgrade.

“The refreshes need to come if you want to survive as a company,” Bülow said, arguing that newer versions of workplace software and operating systems will continue to demand more from employee devices. Yet the business case still needs to be based on the applications employees will use, rather than a broad promise of AI capability.

For many organisations, cloud-based tools will remain sufficient. Employees can access generative AI assistants without buying new devices, while many collaboration features already work on standard business laptops.

The more compelling argument for a higher-specification device comes when a company has a defined local AI workload, a privacy requirement, or a need to limit dependence on cloud services.

Hybrid Work Benefits Remain Modest

For hybrid workers, the immediate benefits of AI-focused hardware are likely to be incremental rather than transformational.

Bülow pointed to enhancements in noise cancellation, video processing and AI dictation as examples of features that can improve day-to-day collaboration. These functions can make calls clearer, reduce distractions and support more accessible meetings.

But he described them as lighter use cases.

“When you start looking at real knowledge workers that work with very complex tasks and automations, then you need more compute power."

Buy for the Workload, Not the Label

The key message for IT leaders is simple: an AI label is not a purchasing strategy.

Businesses planning a refresh should identify which AI tools their employees use now, which features are likely to matter over the life of the device, and whether those tools run locally or in the cloud. They should also assess memory, storage, manageability, security and lifecycle requirements alongside any NPU specification.

Bülow’s argument does not dismiss the AI laptop outright. Instead, it challenges the assumption that every new device carrying the label offers the same value.

For many employees, AI will remain a cloud service that works on existing hardware. For a smaller group, local models may create a genuine need for far more powerful devices.

The problem for buyers is that both are currently being marketed as the same thing.

rate this story
helps rank stories across uc today
Join the conversation

Does this reflect your experience?

opening the room…